In this unit, I learned about a variety of
concepts involving rotation. For starters, we learned about tangential and
rotational speed. Tangential velocity
is the linear speed of something moving along a circular path. Rotational velocity involves the number
of rotations an object makes per minute.
The farther from the center, the more an
object’s tangential speed increases. This is because there is more mass farther
away from the axis of rotation so the object rotates slower- but this has to do
with rotational inertia, which I will explain in a moment.
The difference between rotational and
tangential speed is that tangential speed increases the farther away from the
center the object is, but rotational speed remains the same no matter where the
object is. For example, if one person is close to the inside of a
merry-go-round, and their friend is riding a horse along the outside, the
friend on the outside will have a faster tangential velocity but they will be
moving at the same rotational speed. Additionally, if two objects are the same
size, they have the same rotational speed. When two objects are different
sizes, it is possible for them to have the same rotational speed but different
tangential speeds, like the gears shown below:
Although the picture shows circles, imagine
that they are gears that interlock. Because they are connected, a point along
the edge of the larger gear will cover the same distance as a point on the edge
of the smaller gear in an amount of time, meaning that they have the same tangential
velocity. However, the smaller gear will be able to rotate once in a shorter
amount of time than the larger gear. In fact, these gears share a 1:3 ratio;
meaning that the rotational velocity of the smaller gear is faster than that of
the larger gear and the smaller one will rotate completely three times in the
time it takes the larger gear to rotate once.
Conversely, objects can also have the same
rotational velocity and different tangential velocities. Just like on the
merry-go-round, this applies to train wheels. They are tapered so that one side
of the wheel is wider than the other and two wheels of this shape are
connected. Since the sides are connected, they have the same rotational
velocity. The wider part of the wheel has a higher tangential velocity and
moves faster because it is farther away from the center than the smaller sides
of the wheels. This higher tangential velocity causes the wider part of the
wheel to curve inward so that the rails are off-center. When one side of the
wheel curves, this causes the other side to curve as well and the wheel self
corrects. This is why trains sway on the tracks.
Another related concept is that of rotational inertia. This is the
property of an object to resist changes in spin (similar to linear inertia
which is the property of an object to resist changes in motion). Rotational
inertia depends where the mass is located, or the distribution of mass. As I
said before, the farther away the mass is from the axis of rotation, the harder
it is for an object to spin- aka, the more rotational inertia it has. If the
mass is close to the center/axis of rotation, the object has little rotational
inertia. When a runner is trying to go faster, they bend their legs. This
brings their leg closer to their hip, which is the axis of rotation. Bringing
their leg closer brings the mass closer, so the leg/hip system has less
rotational inertia and it is easier to rotate/run. The less rotational inertia
and object has, the faster its rotational velocity. This allows the runner to
go faster. This concept also applies to ice skaters when they do their big
finishes with crazy spins.
When an ice skater has her arms spread out and
her legs are wide, her mass is distributed farther from her body (axis of
rotation) so she has more rotational inertia and she has a low rotational
velocity- she is spinning slowly. Then she brings her arms and legs in to her
body, drawing the mass in closer to the axis of rotation and decreasing the
rotational inertia, allowing her to spin faster. This brings us to the concept
of angular, or rotational, momentum.
Angular momentum = rotational inertia x rotational velocity. Just like the
conservation of linear momentum, there is conservation
of angular momentum. When there is a change in an object’s spin, the
momentum is the same before and after. So if the ice skater has a high
rotational inertia and a low rotational velocity before, and she has a low
rotational inertia after, she must also have a high rotational velocity after
to equalize the equation and make the momentum before and after her change in
spin the same.
Angular Momentum before = Angular Momentum
after
So by this point, we know a lot about rotation
and how it affects an object’s movement. But what causes rotation?
Torque, ladies and gentlemen,
causes rotation. A torque is a force exerted over the distance from the axis of
rotation. This distance is called a lever arm.
Torque = Force x Lever Arm
There are three ways to increase torque, and
therefore increase the rotation of said object:
11) Increase the force on the object
22) Increase the lever arm
33) Increase both the force and the lever arm
The Forces on both sides of the rod being
balanced in the picture above are equal. Their lever arms are also equal. This
means that they have equivalent forces on both sides of the rod so it is
balanced. If one side had a greater torque than the other, this would cause a
rotation and the rod would no longer be balanced. Also, if one side had a
greater force than the other side but the other side had an equally greater
lever arm, the forces would be equal.
Torque = Torque
Force x lever arm = Force x lever arm
(Just like the conservation of momentum)
As a side note, the force must be perpendicularly
applied to the lever arm. Torque is measured in units of Newton meters (Nm).
One thing you will notice in the picture above
that I have not yet talked about, is the center
of gravity. The center of gravity is essentially the same as an object’s center of mass, which is the average
position of all the object’s mass. When gravity acts on this exact point, it
becomes the object’s center of gravity. This is actually what keeps us from
falling over. As long as our center of gravity is above our base of support, there is no lever arm
and without a lever arm, no torque can be generated, meaning there is no
rotation and we don’t fall over.
In sports, it is easy to be knocked over. But
if you change either your center of gravity or your base of support, it is
harder to be knocked over. Bending your knees lowers your center of gravity so
it is harder to push it out from above the base of support as has been done to
the box in the picture above. If you stand with your feet planted at least
shoulder width apart (larger than your natural stance) this widens your base of
support, which also makes it harder to displace the center of gravity outside
the base of support. These two adjustments make it much harder to knock you
over.
Lastly, we learned about centripetal and
centrifugal forces. Centripetal force
is a center seeking force. It is the force acting on you, pulling you into a
curve. When an object moves, its velocity is always straight. Combined with a
centripetal force equal to the velocity, the object can follow a curved path.
This is why the moon orbits the Earth (the centripetal force being the pull of
Earth’s gravity).
The most difficult thing about what we have
studied in this unit has been grasping the visualizations of certain concepts.
I am primarily a visual learner so this was a little challenging at times. For
example, I have seen ice skaters and we watched videos of ice skaters spinning
and getting faster, but I do not know what a train wheel actually looks like
aside from the strange diagrams and drawings we looked at in class. Sure, I’ve
seen a train wheel before, but not from the angle we were considering. This
made the concept of train wheels and their tangential velocities hard to
understand at first. I overcame this by just accepting what Mrs. Lawrence was
teaching me and applying the concepts to the picture I was provided. Eventually
the idea cleared up and I grasped the concept. All it really took was for me to
open up to a new perspective.
I think my effort towards homework and quizzes
improved noticeably this unit. I studied for nearly all of the small quizzes we
took and I spent a lot of time writing out my homework and forming really
thorough answers which paid off as it aided in my understanding of the lessons.
This boosted my confidence in class when we were discussing some harder
problems. Also it developed my communication; I feel pretty good about
explaining the information in this unit because I spent so much time explaining
it to myself and writing out these explanations in a way that I can go back and
read in a few months and still get it. I also think that my group for this
podcast collaborated more efficiently and easily than my groups in the past. I
am really glad that I will be working with the same group for a little while
because I think we work well together and I would say this is one of the more
articulate podcasts that I have been a part of making.
My goal for the next unit is to spend more time
on my podcast and do something a little more unique. I also am going to have a
more positive attitude in class!
I liked this unit a lot, even though I did not
immediately “get” everything we talked about. I love sports and just about everything
in this unit can be applied to my main sports- I run, so now I understand why bending
my legs more will help with sprinting. In playing soccer, I will definitely
widen my stance and bend my knees more to keep from being knocked down- which
seems to happen to me a lot. Also I have been catching even more physics
mistakes in song lyrics since this unit. Yay for physics!
No comments:
Post a Comment